Home » The Darwin Delusion: But Old Mr. Dawin wasnt to Blame (The Darwin Delusion #1) by Maria B. OHare
The Darwin Delusion: But Old Mr. Dawin wasnt to Blame  (The Darwin Delusion #1) Maria B. OHare

The Darwin Delusion: But Old Mr. Dawin wasnt to Blame (The Darwin Delusion #1)

Maria B. OHare

Published May 13th 2014
ISBN :
Kindle Edition
223 pages
Enter the sum

 About the Book 

About the bookAs Eugene Koonin (a well recognised expert in the field of evolutionary and computational biology), states in The Origin at 150: is a new evolutionary synthesis in sight? (2009): “The edifice of the Modern Synthesis has crumbled,MoreAbout the bookAs Eugene Koonin (a well recognised expert in the field of evolutionary and computational biology), states in The Origin at 150: is a new evolutionary synthesis in sight? (2009): “The edifice of the Modern Synthesis has crumbled, apparently, beyond repair” (Koonin E.V. 2009) [1], and therefore, in order to explain why this is the case, I have researched and written this book in the hope that I can explain to non-specialists, like myself (I’m not an evolutionary biologist, but an archaeologist and independent researcher which gave me some tools to begin tackling such a deeply entrenched topic) how our modern synthesis got to this point of no return. Obviously, most Darwinists would not accept that their edifice is crumbling, but that is not because it isn’t: it is simply because there is so much invested in it. This publication is not written to denigrate anyone, and certainly does not blame Old Mr. Darwin, as the subtitle suggests, but instead it will attempt to redress the massive imbalance in this discussion, where only the Neo-Darwinian theory is ever heard within the public arena and treated as a scientific fact: and not the scientific objections or other empirically testable alternatives.‘The Darwin Delusion: But Old Mr. Darwin wasnt to Blame’, is as the subtitle suggests, not an attack on Darwin, just a justifiably critical assessment of the entire Neo-Darwinian synthesis in a very short read and entirely backed up by our most recent science. I also give the historical backdrop (again sourced and supported) to why the Neo-Darwinian synthesis was never based upon the scientific approach in the first place. Its a conversation starter - a rational one free of ideological positions. I hope you enjoy.Cheers MariaBrigit